{
    "$schema": "https://antichrist.net/en-us/public-content.schema.json/",
    "schema_version": "1.0.0",
    "record_type": "acn.public_content",
    "content_type": "wordpress-page",
    "id": "acn:post:139",
    "slug": "review-workflow",
    "title": "Review Workflow",
    "description": "The review workflow is what keeps the graph from becoming a rumor engine. A claim can be interesting, popular, or emotionally powerful and still not be ready for public framing.What to noticeStatuses protect readersProposed, reviewed, contested, stale, corrected, rejected, retracted, sensitive, and published should be…",
    "language": "en-US",
    "canonical_url": "https://antichrist.net/en-us/prophecy-knowledge-graph/review-workflow/",
    "representations": {
        "html": "https://antichrist.net/en-us/prophecy-knowledge-graph/review-workflow/",
        "markdown": "https://antichrist.net/en-us/prophecy-knowledge-graph/review-workflow.md",
        "json": "https://antichrist.net/en-us/prophecy-knowledge-graph/review-workflow.json"
    },
    "published": true,
    "published_utc": "2026-05-14T04:24:56Z",
    "modified_utc": "2026-05-18T12:53:31Z",
    "source": {
        "authority": "https://antichrist.net/en-us/",
        "wordpress": true
    },
    "content": {
        "html": "<div class=\"editorial-callout\">\n<p>The review workflow is what keeps the graph from becoming a rumor engine. A claim can be interesting, popular, or emotionally powerful and still not be ready for public framing.</p>\n</div>\n<section class=\"section-directory\">\n<h2>What to notice</h2>\n<div class=\"section-directory-grid\">\n<article class=\"section-directory-card\"><strong>Statuses protect readers</strong><span>Proposed, reviewed, contested, stale, corrected, rejected, retracted, sensitive, and published should be explicit.</span></article>\n<article class=\"section-directory-card\"><strong>Human review remains central</strong><span>Automation can suggest; editors decide what is safe, clear, and fair to publish.</span></article>\n<article class=\"section-directory-card\"><strong>Memory matters</strong><span>Corrections and failed claims should remain visible enough to prevent endless recycling.</span></article>\n</div>\n</section>\n<section class=\"editorial-callout\">\n<h2>Discussion questions</h2>\n<ul>\n<li>What should trigger a re-review?</li>\n<li>How can correction be visible without becoming punitive?</li>\n</ul>\n</section>\n",
        "plain_text": "The review workflow is what keeps the graph from becoming a rumor engine. A claim can be interesting, popular, or emotionally powerful and still not be ready for public framing. What to notice Statuses protect readersProposed, reviewed, contested, stale, corrected, rejected, retracted, sensitive, and published should be explicit. Human review remains centralAutomation can suggest; editors decide what is safe, clear, and fair to publish. Memory mattersCorrections and failed claims should remain visible enough to prevent endless recycling. Discussion questions What should trigger a re-review? How can correction be visible without becoming punitive?"
    },
    "content_sha256": "93b66738aca2b66d051485ca8d0a1500a606b4084a786cd8fd7653785b131fc5"
}