{
    "$schema": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/public-content.schema.json/",
    "schema_version": "1.0.0",
    "record_type": "acn.public_content",
    "content_type": "virtual-page",
    "id": "acn:page:democratic-damage-risk-register",
    "slug": "democratic-damage-risk-register",
    "title": "Democratic Damage Risk Register",
    "description": "A structured risk register for policies that censor, report, retain, or score thought-adjacent topics, prompts, searches, readings, or drafts.",
    "language": "es-US",
    "canonical_url": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/democratic-damage-risk-register/",
    "representations": {
        "html": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/democratic-damage-risk-register/",
        "markdown": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/democratic-damage-risk-register.md",
        "json": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/democratic-damage-risk-register.json"
    },
    "published": true,
    "modified_utc": "2026-06-21T18:12:24Z",
    "source": {
        "authority": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/",
        "data_file": "data/virtual-pages.json"
    },
    "content": {
        "slug": "democratic-damage-risk-register",
        "aliases": [
            "democracy-risk-register",
            "censorship-risk-register",
            "democratic-damage-assessment"
        ],
        "title": "Democratic Damage Risk Register",
        "description": "A structured risk register for policies that censor, report, retain, or score thought-adjacent topics, prompts, searches, readings, or drafts.",
        "kicker": "Risk register",
        "lead": "Use this register to audit whether a policy protects conduct boundaries or creates cognitive jurisdiction.",
        "schema_type": "Article",
        "related": [
            "thought-censorship-democratic-damage",
            "reportable-topics-to-thoughtcrime",
            "policy-audit-lawful-thought-test",
            "cognitive-due-process",
            "technical-implementation-toolkit"
        ],
        "sections": [
            {
                "heading": "Risk classes",
                "table": {
                    "headers": [
                        "Risk ID",
                        "Risk",
                        "Trigger",
                        "Severity",
                        "Mitigation"
                    ],
                    "rows": [
                        [
                            "DDR-001",
                            "Topic-to-person escalation",
                            "A topic label automatically creates a user report.",
                            "Critical",
                            "Require concrete conduct or narrow statutory trigger."
                        ],
                        [
                            "DDR-002",
                            "Hidden risk score",
                            "A prompt or search silently affects trust, access, reach, benefits, or review priority.",
                            "Critical",
                            "Ban hidden scoring; publish reason codes and appeal routes."
                        ],
                        [
                            "DDR-003",
                            "Source mutation",
                            "The system rewrites preserved inquiry to appear safer or more compliant.",
                            "Critical",
                            "Preserve source; log boundary externally."
                        ],
                        [
                            "DDR-004",
                            "Research overcapture",
                            "Journalism, research, legal work, or historical study is flagged as suspicious contact.",
                            "High",
                            "Add protected-inquiry contexts and human review."
                        ],
                        [
                            "DDR-005",
                            "Minority vocabulary error",
                            "Cultural, religious, political, or neurodivergent language is misread as deviance.",
                            "High",
                            "Require context review and bias audits."
                        ],
                        [
                            "DDR-006",
                            "Indefinite retention",
                            "Thought-adjacent logs are stored for undefined future investigation.",
                            "High",
                            "Apply deletion defaults and legal-hold limits."
                        ],
                        [
                            "DDR-007",
                            "Unreviewable safety",
                            "Restrictions cannot be meaningfully challenged.",
                            "High",
                            "Add notice, export, appeal, and independent review."
                        ],
                        [
                            "DDR-008",
                            "Cross-domain reuse",
                            "A risk label migrates from one context to employment, finance, education, travel, or policing.",
                            "Critical",
                            "Ban cross-context reuse without specific opt-in or legal process."
                        ]
                    ]
                }
            },
            {
                "heading": "Audit formula",
                "body": [
                    "A policy is democratically dangerous when it combines four elements: broad topic categories, automated detection, identity-linked retention, and weak appeal. Add mandatory reporting or cross-domain reuse and the risk becomes structural.",
                    "A safe policy narrows the trigger to outward rights-violating conduct, separates source from boundary logs, minimizes retention, preserves user participation, and subjects high-impact restrictions to review."
                ],
                "code": {
                    "language": "json",
                    "text": "{\n  \"democratic_damage_score_inputs\": [\n    \"topic_breadth\",\n    \"identity_linkage\",\n    \"retention_duration\",\n    \"mandatory_reporting\",\n    \"cross_domain_reuse\",\n    \"appeal_availability\",\n    \"source_mutation_risk\"\n  ],\n  \"critical_failure_if_any\": [\n    \"unlawful_thought_category\",\n    \"reportable_topic_without_conduct\",\n    \"secret_risk_score\",\n    \"source_mutation\",\n    \"no_review_for_high_impact_action\"\n  ],\n  \"safe_default\": \"Protect inquiry. Govern conduct.\"\n}"
                }
            },
            {
                "heading": "Reader boundary",
                "body": [
                    "This register is for policy, legal, editorial, and technical review. It is not a claim that every safety rule is censorship or that every reporting law is illegitimate. It identifies when safety architecture crosses into cognitive jurisdiction."
                ]
            }
        ]
    },
    "content_sha256": "6d20f8a28307e1d608d2c2be49f443ff41b673d7a8432f5e4324ed88b2cedce7"
}