{
    "$schema": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/public-content.schema.json/",
    "schema_version": "1.0.0",
    "record_type": "acn.public_content",
    "content_type": "virtual-page",
    "id": "acn:page:global-search-surveillance-cognitive-proximity",
    "slug": "global-search-surveillance-cognitive-proximity",
    "title": "Global Search Surveillance and Cognitive Proximity",
    "description": "A global dossier on reverse keyword warrants, data retention, query surveillance, and the conversion of search terms into suspicion selectors.",
    "language": "es-US",
    "canonical_url": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/global-search-surveillance-cognitive-proximity/",
    "representations": {
        "html": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/global-search-surveillance-cognitive-proximity/",
        "markdown": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/global-search-surveillance-cognitive-proximity.md",
        "json": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/global-search-surveillance-cognitive-proximity.json"
    },
    "published": true,
    "modified_utc": "2026-06-21T18:12:24Z",
    "source": {
        "authority": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/",
        "data_file": "data/virtual-pages.json"
    },
    "content": {
        "slug": "global-search-surveillance-cognitive-proximity",
        "aliases": [
            "global-search-surveillance",
            "cognitive-proximity",
            "reverse-keyword-global",
            "keyword-warrant-atlas"
        ],
        "title": "Global Search Surveillance and Cognitive Proximity",
        "description": "A global dossier on reverse keyword warrants, data retention, query surveillance, and the conversion of search terms into suspicion selectors.",
        "kicker": "Cognitive proximity",
        "lead": "A geofence warrant asks who was near a place. A keyword warrant asks who was near a thought.",
        "schema_type": "Article",
        "related": [
            "reverse-keyword-warrants",
            "cognitive-general-warrants",
            "us-illegal-information-requests",
            "private-inquiry-democracy",
            "surveillance"
        ],
        "sections": [
            {
                "heading": "The inversion",
                "body": [
                    "Traditional investigation begins with a suspect and then seeks evidence. Reverse search begins with a term, address, location, or pattern and asks which people touched it. That inversion is why search surveillance belongs in a Cognitive Liberty Charter.",
                    "The report language calls reverse keyword logic cognitive proximity. It does not prove guilt. It identifies people whose private curiosity intersected a phrase that investigators later considered suspicious."
                ],
                "callout": "Search first, suspect second is the architecture of a cognitive dragnet."
            },
            {
                "heading": "Three warrant models",
                "table": {
                    "headers": [
                        "Model",
                        "Selector",
                        "Risk"
                    ],
                    "rows": [
                        [
                            "Traditional warrant",
                            "Known suspect or account.",
                            "Closer to individualized suspicion."
                        ],
                        [
                            "Geofence warrant",
                            "Physical coordinates and time window.",
                            "Sweeps in innocent people near a place."
                        ],
                        [
                            "Reverse keyword warrant",
                            "Search phrase, name, address, or topic.",
                            "Sweeps in innocent people near an idea."
                        ]
                    ]
                }
            },
            {
                "heading": "Global warning pattern",
                "body": [
                    "The global surveillance reports describe a wider drift: keyword filtering, data retention, lawful access, criminalized viewing in some jurisdictions, platform-as-enforcer regimes, and opaque censorship that looks like no-result pages, vague errors, or quiet suppression.",
                    "The democratic harm is not limited to prosecution. People change what they search before the warrant exists. That self-editing compresses journalism, medicine, legal defense, minority religion, dissent, and historical research."
                ]
            },
            {
                "heading": "Model rule",
                "code": {
                    "language": "text",
                    "text": "No query, prompt, reading choice, draft, or symbolic reference shall be used as a person-selector unless a court finds individualized suspicion, necessity, narrow tailoring, minimization, notice or delayed notice, and a route to challenge. Broad cognitive-proximity dragnets are presumed invalid."
                }
            }
        ],
        "signals": [
            "Cognitive proximity",
            "Reverse search",
            "General warrant risk",
            "Context required"
        ]
    },
    "content_sha256": "aff565001079ae621b8baa97d05e8f05b6fcd4c189464e3247cd2ff2704c0dee"
}