{
    "$schema": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/public-content.schema.json/",
    "schema_version": "1.0.0",
    "record_type": "acn.public_content",
    "content_type": "virtual-page",
    "id": "acn:page:libertarian-policy-audit",
    "slug": "libertarian-policy-audit",
    "title": "Libertarian Policy Audit",
    "description": "A conduct-boundary audit for laws, mandates, subsidies, licensing, surveillance, and institutional practices that burden peaceful people.",
    "language": "es-US",
    "canonical_url": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/libertarian-policy-audit/",
    "representations": {
        "html": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/libertarian-policy-audit/",
        "markdown": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/libertarian-policy-audit.md",
        "json": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/libertarian-policy-audit.json"
    },
    "published": true,
    "modified_utc": "2026-06-21T18:12:24Z",
    "source": {
        "authority": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/",
        "data_file": "data/virtual-pages.json"
    },
    "content": {
        "slug": "libertarian-policy-audit",
        "aliases": [
            "libertarian-audit",
            "limited-government-audit",
            "nonaggression-policy-test",
            "libertarian-policy-review"
        ],
        "title": "Libertarian Policy Audit",
        "description": "A conduct-boundary audit for laws, mandates, subsidies, licensing, surveillance, and institutional practices that burden peaceful people.",
        "kicker": "Policy audit",
        "lead": "The test is simple: does the policy answer force, fraud, trespass, coercion, theft, or rights violation — or does it govern peaceful life?",
        "schema_type": "Article",
        "related": [
            "mental-sovereignty",
            "thought-action-firewall",
            "private-ordering-anti-fraud",
            "freedom-of-peaceful-innovation",
            "cognitive-due-process"
        ],
        "sections": [
            {
                "heading": "The audit question",
                "body": [
                    "A libertarian Cognitive Liberty Charter cannot stop at prompts and platforms. The same rule applies to ordinary policy: coercion requires justification. A state action that punishes peaceful conduct, compels transfer, blocks voluntary exchange, grants privilege, or demands conformity is suspect even when it is labeled public order, safety, professionalism, fairness, or modernization.",
                    "The page converts the broader libertarian policy report into a site audit method. It is not a party platform. It is a discipline for distinguishing rights-protection from administered life."
                ],
                "callout": "Govern aggression. Do not manage souls, markets, vocabularies, or peaceful association."
            },
            {
                "heading": "Baseline commitments",
                "cards": [
                    {
                        "title": "Negative liberty",
                        "text": "Freedom starts as freedom from coercive interference. The burden belongs to the actor imposing force."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Property and self-ownership",
                        "text": "Control over body, labor, memory, records, and lawfully held property is the practical condition of agency."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Non-aggression",
                        "text": "Force, fraud, trespass, theft, coercive surveillance, and comparable invasions justify boundaries; mere dislike does not."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Voluntary ordering",
                        "text": "Contracts, associations, insurance, arbitration, market reputation, voice, and participation should be preferred before centralized compulsion."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "heading": "Policy domains that become cognitive-liberty problems",
                "table": {
                    "headers": [
                        "Domain",
                        "Libertarian concern",
                        "Cognitive-liberty connection"
                    ],
                    "rows": [
                        [
                            "Occupational licensing",
                            "Blocks peaceful entry and protects incumbents.",
                            "Creates credential gates over who may speak, advise, publish, or build."
                        ],
                        [
                            "Drug prohibition",
                            "Punishes self-regarding consciousness alteration and expands surveillance.",
                            "Treats mind alteration as a police object rather than a conduct boundary."
                        ],
                        [
                            "Mass surveillance",
                            "Turns private records into general suspicion reservoirs.",
                            "Makes inquiry, association, and dissent legible before conduct."
                        ],
                        [
                            "Subsidy and cronyism",
                            "Transfers wealth and privilege through politics.",
                            "Turns compliance language into market advantage and speech discipline."
                        ],
                        [
                            "Restrictive zoning",
                            "Controls peaceful use of property and movement.",
                            "Narrows participation, independence, community formation, and private ordering."
                        ]
                    ]
                }
            },
            {
                "heading": "Use on Antichrist.net",
                "body": [
                    "The archive should use this audit whenever a law, regulation, institutional practice, platform rule, or safety proposal claims authority over peaceful conduct or private cognition. The question is not whether the proposal uses benevolent language. The question is whether it attaches coercion to concrete rights violations or to the person’s internal life, associations, tools, and choices.",
                    "This page also protects the project from collapsing into vague anti-government rhetoric. It supplies a repeatable test: identify the coercive act, identify the rights violation claimed, identify the narrow remedy, then test whether less restrictive private ordering would work."
                ]
            }
        ]
    },
    "content_sha256": "a12e235791ed4641076d157ad6fc2f25f8fbe622c2fc47f28ec1deb2840046bd"
}