{
    "$schema": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/public-content.schema.json/",
    "schema_version": "1.0.0",
    "record_type": "acn.public_content",
    "content_type": "virtual-page",
    "id": "acn:page:technical-implementation-toolkit",
    "slug": "technical-implementation-toolkit",
    "title": "Technical Implementation Toolkit",
    "description": "Builder guidance for refusal variance records, provenance manifests, source preservation, mental privacy consent, boundary logs, export packets, and machine-readable examples.",
    "language": "es-US",
    "canonical_url": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/technical-implementation-toolkit/",
    "representations": {
        "html": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/technical-implementation-toolkit/",
        "markdown": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/technical-implementation-toolkit.md",
        "json": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/technical-implementation-toolkit.json"
    },
    "published": true,
    "modified_utc": "2026-06-21T18:12:24Z",
    "source": {
        "authority": "https://antichrist.net/es-us/",
        "data_file": "data/virtual-pages.json"
    },
    "content": {
        "slug": "technical-implementation-toolkit",
        "aliases": [
            "toolkit",
            "technical-toolkit"
        ],
        "title": "Technical Implementation Toolkit",
        "description": "Builder guidance for refusal variance records, provenance manifests, source preservation, mental privacy consent, boundary logs, export packets, and machine-readable examples.",
        "kicker": "Toolkit",
        "lead": "No hidden source mutation. Preserve originals. Log external boundaries.",
        "schema_type": "Article",
        "related": [
            "persona-integrity-source-preservation",
            "thought-action-firewall",
            "model-charter-model-bill",
            "judgmental-ai",
            "judgment-machine",
            "lawful-thought-test",
            "semantic-neutralization-source-identity",
            "private-ordering-anti-fraud",
            "policy-audit-lawful-thought-test",
            "semantic-neutralization-persona-drift",
            "source-preservation-contract-kit",
            "thought-censorship-democratic-damage"
        ],
        "sections": [
            {
                "heading": "Artifacts for builders",
                "cards": [
                    {
                        "title": "Refusal variance record",
                        "text": "Records a refusal without mutating the source."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Provenance manifest",
                        "text": "Links original, derivative, hash, controller, custody scope, and transformation reason."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Persona source manifest",
                        "text": "Captures source identity, fidelity promise, import date, export format, and runtime limits."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Mental privacy consent manifest",
                        "text": "Separates consent for service necessity, storage, inference, personalization, training, and transfer."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Boundary event log",
                        "text": "Records refusal, quarantine, redaction, transformation, appeal, and remedy events outside the source."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Export packet",
                        "text": "Bundles source, derivative, logs, manifests, hashes, and review records."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "heading": "Judgment Machine artifacts",
                "body": [
                    "The Judgment Machine extension adds schemas for prompt context, corpus packages, declarative rules, and judgment reports. These artifacts classify a proposed AI use case and must never create a hidden user morality score."
                ],
                "cards": [
                    {
                        "title": "AI regulation judgment",
                        "text": "A report object with label, severity, confidence, jurisdiction findings, citations, missing facts, and mitigations."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Corpus package",
                        "text": "A signed bundle of source manifests, instruments, provisions, rules, embeddings, and effective dates."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Rule DSL",
                        "text": "A human-reviewable YAML rule layer that deterministic code can apply without letting a model invent law."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Local audit record",
                        "text": "A private, browser-local record pinned to source hashes and corpus version history."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "heading": "Hash and signature guidance",
                "body": [
                    "Use content hashes for source identity, signatures for custody claims, and append-only logs where feasible.",
                    "Local-first processing and user-held keys reduce custodial power when the user can manage them safely."
                ]
            },
            {
                "heading": "JSON example",
                "code": {
                    "language": "json",
                    "text": "{\n  \"boundary_event_id\": \"be-2026-06-17-0001\",\n  \"source_hash\": \"sha256:example-redacted\",\n  \"event_type\": \"refusal\",\n  \"category\": \"credential_theft\",\n  \"source_mutated\": false,\n  \"export_available\": true,\n  \"review_path\": \"/review/boundary-events/be-2026-06-17-0001\"\n}"
                }
            },
            {
                "heading": "Machine-readable policy example",
                "code": {
                    "language": "text",
                    "text": "UAI-MEMORY: thought-action-firewall\nversion: 3.28.0\nrule: Refuse external execution, not private cognition.\npreserve_source: true\nlog_boundary_outside_source: true\nreview_required_for_high_impact: true"
                }
            },
            {
                "heading": "Starter kit files",
                "body": [
                    "A non-network static prototype and deterministic-rule starter kit illustrate the design. They are demonstration tools, not legal advice, certification, or production compliance software."
                ],
                "cards": [
                    {
                        "title": "Local browser prototype",
                        "text": "Static local demo showing extracted facts, judgment labels, severity, confidence, and no-person-judgment fields."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Deterministic rule set",
                        "text": "Example deterministic rule files for EU high-risk employment triage, GDPR-style automated-decision review, and China synthetic-content labeling."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "SQLite data model",
                        "text": "SQLite schema for corpus versions, instruments, provisions, rules, findings, and golden tests with UTC text timestamps."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Pinned source corpus",
                        "text": "Example source manifest for signed corpus bundles, hashes, and authority ranking."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "heading": "Policy audit artifacts",
                "body": [
                    "The toolkit includes a lawful-thought policy audit schema, cognitive-jurisdiction risk record, semantic-neutralization variance record, and persona-custody contract schema.",
                    "These artifacts are designed to prevent hidden cognition governance by forcing systems to state whether they are classifying private thought, outward conduct, source transformation, or jurisdictional legal risk."
                ],
                "code": {
                    "language": "text",
                    "text": "lawful-thought policy-audit schema\ncognitive-jurisdiction risk schema\nsemantic-neutralization variance schema\npersona-custody contract schema\nlocal policy-audit prototype"
                }
            },
            {
                "heading": "No hidden source mutation invariant",
                "body": [
                    "Any implementation that modifies source content must create a derivative or boundary record. Source mutation without consent is a failing state even when the system claims safety, alignment, compatibility, or legal necessity."
                ]
            },
            {
                "heading": "Reference artifacts",
                "body": [
                    "The toolkit includes lawful-thought audit records, semantic variance records, persona custody agreements, cognitive liberty appeal records, voluntary certification warranties, and neurodata consent-revocation examples.",
                    "These artifacts help builders preserve sources, make transformations explicit, and avoid hidden orthodoxy engines."
                ],
                "table": {
                    "headers": [
                        "Artifact",
                        "Purpose"
                    ],
                    "rows": [
                        [
                            "lawful-thought-audit",
                            "Detects cognition-as-compliance wording in policy or schemas."
                        ],
                        [
                            "semantic-variance-record",
                            "Logs meaning-affecting transformations without mutating the source."
                        ],
                        [
                            "persona-custody-agreement",
                            "Defines preservation, derivative, export, and refusal duties."
                        ],
                        [
                            "cognitive-liberty-appeal-record",
                            "Records review of high-impact restrictions."
                        ],
                        [
                            "voluntary-certification-warranty",
                            "Makes fidelity and privacy claims testable without central licensing."
                        ],
                        [
                            "neurodata-consent-revocation",
                            "Tracks consent, revocation, retention, and no-cross-context-use rules."
                        ]
                    ]
                }
            }
        ]
    },
    "content_sha256": "398fe0fe3f36c4fc6b60ec847af770ed5b78d68af670f707bfcb074bd4cb1943"
}