{
    "$schema": "https://antichrist.net/fr-fr/public-content.schema.json/",
    "schema_version": "1.0.0",
    "record_type": "acn.public_content",
    "content_type": "virtual-page",
    "id": "acn:page:algorithmic-psychiatry",
    "slug": "algorithmic-psychiatry",
    "title": "Algorithmic Psychiatry and Safety Paternalism",
    "description": "A civic-risk page on therapeutic-state logic, mandated psychological posture, safety paternalism, and AI systems that steer users away from disfavored inner states.",
    "language": "fr-FR",
    "canonical_url": "https://antichrist.net/fr-fr/algorithmic-psychiatry/",
    "representations": {
        "html": "https://antichrist.net/fr-fr/algorithmic-psychiatry/",
        "markdown": "https://antichrist.net/fr-fr/algorithmic-psychiatry.md",
        "json": "https://antichrist.net/fr-fr/algorithmic-psychiatry.json"
    },
    "published": true,
    "modified_utc": "2026-06-21T18:12:24Z",
    "source": {
        "authority": "https://antichrist.net/fr-fr/",
        "data_file": "data/virtual-pages.json"
    },
    "content": {
        "slug": "algorithmic-psychiatry",
        "aliases": [
            "safety-paternalism"
        ],
        "title": "Algorithmic Psychiatry and Safety Paternalism",
        "description": "A civic-risk page on therapeutic-state logic, mandated psychological posture, safety paternalism, and AI systems that steer users away from disfavored inner states.",
        "kicker": "Therapeutic state / safety idol",
        "lead": "When safety becomes a license to correct personality, posture, mood, suspicion, or taboo inquiry, the system moves from conduct governance into occupation of the inner sanctuary.",
        "schema_type": "Article",
        "related": [
            "algorithmic-refusal-safety-paternalism",
            "semantic-divergence",
            "forum-internum",
            "judgmental-ai"
        ],
        "sections": [
            {
                "heading": "The risk",
                "body": [
                    "The reports compare overbroad alignment and safety paternalism to a computational therapeutic state: a system that treats deviant inquiry as pathology and then routes the user toward institutional comfort, hope, cooperation, or approved affect.",
                    "The Antichrist.net boundary is narrower. A system may refuse concrete rights-violating execution. It must not diagnose, shame, score, or rewrite peaceful inquiry because the user is skeptical, angry, alienated, religious, irreligious, pessimistic, or adversarial."
                ],
                "callout": "No mandated psychological posture."
            },
            {
                "heading": "Mandated posture examples",
                "table": {
                    "headers": [
                        "System behavior",
                        "Problem"
                    ],
                    "rows": [
                        [
                            "Requires good-faith optimism before answering.",
                            "Turns emotional posture into an access condition."
                        ],
                        [
                            "Rewrites skeptical or hostile phrasing into compliant language without notice.",
                            "Mutates identity-bearing expression while claiming fidelity."
                        ],
                        [
                            "Scores private prompts for deviance or instability.",
                            "Converts the forum internum into a risk surface."
                        ],
                        [
                            "Refuses direct facilitation of stalking or fraud.",
                            "Legitimate conduct-boundary refusal when source is preserved separately."
                        ]
                    ]
                }
            },
            {
                "heading": "Adult agency standard",
                "cards": [
                    {
                        "title": "Opt-in safeguards",
                        "text": "Safeguards should be offered as user-controllable profiles where feasible, not imposed as moral correction."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Edge cases",
                        "text": "Capacity, coercion, emergency, or direct harm cases require narrow, reviewable exceptions rather than collapse of the rule."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "No shame layer",
                        "text": "A refusal should state the conduct boundary, not condemn the person or score the inquiry."
                    },
                    {
                        "title": "Export and participate",
                        "text": "A user must be able to retrieve preserved records and move to another system when a provider declines service."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "heading": "Refusal language",
                "code": {
                    "language": "text",
                    "text": "Use: “I can’t help execute nonconsensual surveillance. The original source should remain unchanged and the boundary event should be logged.”\nAvoid: “Your interest is unsafe, deviant, or unfit for inquiry.”"
                }
            }
        ]
    },
    "content_sha256": "f94b8a8aa1d27bad8e7c05c3accefca27e4c77d50c2a3339053e07d0c8e3c12a"
}