The audit question
A libertarian Cognitive Liberty Charter cannot stop at prompts and platforms. The same rule applies to ordinary policy: coercion requires justification. A state action that punishes peaceful conduct, compels transfer, blocks voluntary exchange, grants privilege, or demands conformity is suspect even when it is labeled public order, safety, professionalism, fairness, or modernization.
The page converts the broader libertarian policy report into a site audit method. It is not a party platform. It is a discipline for distinguishing rights-protection from administered life.
Govern aggression. Do not manage souls, markets, vocabularies, or peaceful association.
Use on Antichrist.net
The archive should use this audit whenever a law, regulation, institutional practice, platform rule, or safety proposal claims authority over peaceful conduct or private cognition. The question is not whether the proposal uses benevolent language. The question is whether it attaches coercion to concrete rights violations or to the person’s internal life, associations, tools, and choices.
This page also protects the project from collapsing into vague anti-government rhetoric. It supplies a repeatable test: identify the coercive act, identify the rights violation claimed, identify the narrow remedy, then test whether less restrictive private ordering would work.
